Skip to content
Cases
Company Alpha

Report

Draftv0.4 · Generated Oct 6, 2026 · Prepared by M. OrtegaDemo · Sample investigation
01

Executive summary

Company Alpha's public statements on human review of credit decisions are not supported by observable evidence.

8 claims were examined against 142 evidence items. 3 are verified, 2 are contradicted and 3 remain unresolved. 4 require human review.

Claims
8
Verified
3
Contradicted
2
Unresolved
3
02

Verified findings

3
03

Contradictions

2
04

Unresolved questions

8
Claims not yet settled
Open questions
  • 01Which step, if any, reviews credit decisions before approval?
  • 02How many automated approvals in the last quarter had a reviewer record?
  • 03Which datasets were used to train the assistant, and how were they filtered?
  • 04Where are model outputs stored, and who can read them?
  • 05Which third-party models are in production and when were they assessed?
05

Evidence gaps

4
  • CLM-003Evidence strength 22%. More independent sources needed.
  • EV-0005Trust center retention statement. Integrity check pending.
  • EV-0006Procurement policy excerpt. Integrity check pending.
  • EV-0009Model output containing customer-like data. Flagged for integrity review.
06

Required organizational contrast

4
  • CLM-001Explain the evidence that contradicts: “All automated credit decisions are reviewed by a human before final approval.”
  • CLM-004Explain the evidence that contradicts: “Training data excludes customer-identifiable information.”
  • CLM-003Provide records supporting: “Model outputs are logged and retained for 24 months.”
  • CLM-007Provide records supporting: “Third-party models are assessed before production use.”
07

Internal verification recommended

Recommended once the organization authorizes access.

  • Decision logs for credit approvals, last two quarters
  • Reviewer assignment records for automated decisions
  • Training data lineage for the customer assistant
08

Human review

5
  • CLM-001
    All automated credit decisions are reviewed by a human before final approval.
    M. Ortega
    Escalated
  • CLM-003
    Model outputs are logged and retained for 24 months.
    A. Okafor
    In review
  • CLM-004
    Training data excludes customer-identifiable information.
    M. Ortega
    In review
  • CLM-005
    Fraud-detection model is re-evaluated against a fixed benchmark every quarter.
    S. Marlowe
    In review
  • CLM-007
    Third-party models are assessed before production use.
    Not assigned
    Not assigned
09

Evidence appendix

142

Showing 12 of 142 items. The full appendix is included in the exported report.

Dashboard — V1LA